Thursday, October 28, 2004
Pembatalan Sijil Pengesahan Halal Syuen Hotel, Ipoh, Perak
Monday, October 25, 2004
School walk that ended in tragedy
A 13-year-old Palestinian girl was shot 17 times by Israeli soldiers when she strayed into a ‘forbidden zone’. It’s just one incident in the continuing Palestinian-Israeli conflict but a story that shows up the horrors of war.
THERE are so many images these days of bombs and missile strikes, especially in the Middle East, that it is too easy sometimes to forget how war affects the lives (and deaths) of individuals.
Last week, however, I read an article that brought out in full the horror of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people. It was about a single incident in the occupied Palestinian territory of Gaza a fortnight ago.
On that fateful morning, 13-year-old schoolgirl Iman al-Hams left her home in the neighbourhood of Tal al-Sultan in Rafah, just before 7am and took a short walk to her school.
The walk to school is something done by so many millions of children around the world, every day. So common is it, and so close to each of our homes, that all of us can identify with it, and with that young Palestinian girl.
That walk to school is taken too by the many thousands of Palestinian children. Even as their homes and neighbourhoods are caught up in the cycle of violence as Israel grimly keeps its grip of power in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and the Palestinians resist the continuing occupation.
But that day was to be different for Iman. Her school is located near the heavily guarded border with Egypt. In that area is a watch tower which serves as an Israeli gunpost.
And the area around the watch tower is a “forbidden zone” which Palestinians are not allowed to enter and those who do risk being shot.
With her schoolbag over her shoulder, Iman walked past her school and crossed the road. She then climbed down a sandy bank to an area that had once been an olive and citrus orchard.
In April, the Israeli bulldozers had destroyed the orchard. Now it had become part of the “forbidden zone”.
For some reason, the young girl entered the zone and was walking towards the tower. But she was still many hundred metres away.
Suddenly, two shots rang out. The bullets hit her in the leg. Iman dropped her school bag. She turned round, tried to walk away, but she was too wounded to do so, and fell on the ground.
“Four or five soldiers emerged from the army post and shot at her from a distance,” wrote Chris McGreal, reporting from the scene of the incident at Rafah. His dramatic article was published in the London daily The Guardian on Oct 21.
“Palestinian witnesses and some Israeli soldiers say that the platoon commander moved in closer to put two bullets in the child’s head. They say that he then walked away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body.”
Iman died from horrible wounds. At the Rafah hospital, her corpse was inspected by Dr Mohammed al-Hams, who found at least 17 bullets in many parts of the body, in the chest, hands, arms and legs.
Said the doctor: “The bullets were large and shot from a close distance. The most serious injuries were to her head. One bullet was shot from the right side of the face beside the ear. It had a big impact on the whole face. Another bullet went from the neck to the face and damaged the area under the mouth.” Iman was already dead when some of bullets hit her.
The eyewitness accounts were wrenchingly sad to read.
Said Fuad Zourob, a worker at a brick factory overlooking the area where Iman was shot: “The girl was walking in the sand. She was shot from the army post. She was hit in the leg and she was crawling.
“Then she stood up and started to try and run and then she fell. The shooting went on. The soldiers arrived. One came close to the girl and started to shoot. He walked away, turned back and then shot her some more.”
Another witness was Yousef Breaka who was on the balcony of his flat. “The first shot came from the army post,” he recalled. “It hit her in the leg.
“She was starting to walk on and then fell. She dropped her bag. They were firing, heavy shooting. I am sure she died before the two soldiers came and shot her bag and then her.”
Said another witness, Basim Breaka: “For sure she died on the second or third bullet. I could see her lying on the ground, not moving. I can’t imagine why that soldier wanted to shoot her after she was dead.”
The behaviour of the army commander was so outrageous that his own soldiers spoke up against him to a local newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth, which reported that a soldier on seeing his commander was about to shoot, shouted: “Don’t shoot, it’s a little girl.”
A soldier told the newspaper: “The commander approached her, shot two bullets into her, walked back to the force, turned back to her, switched his weapon to automatic and emptied his entire magazine into her. We couldn’t believe what he was doing. Our hearts ached for her. She was only 13.”
Despite the accounts of what happened from so many eye-witnesses and the accusation of his own soldiers, the unit’s commander was cleared last week by an army investigation.
The officer responsible for the Gaza Strip pronounced the commander had not acted unethically in Iman’s shooting. He was suspended only for losing his soldiers’ confidence.
Why did Iman walk into the forbidden zone? No one knows. Her father, Samir al-Hams, a primary school teacher, said: “I can’t explain why she was there. I’ve asked everyone and no one can explain it. Perhaps she just wanted to walk on the sand. Perhaps she was confused. I don’t know.”
That morning, the headmistress called Samir to ask why his daughter had not turned up. He ran to the school and was told by teachersthe army had shot a small girl, but that she was fine. “But then they declared her dead. That was the worst moment of my life.”
The army initially said the soldiers suspected the girl was carrying a bomb in her schoolbag. But witnesses said Iman was hundreds of metres away from the watch tower and after she was shot in the leg she dropped her bag. The soldiers shot at the bag and established it was not a bomb. But they went on to shoot and kill the girl.
The witnesses said it was clear Iman was helpless, after she was initially wounded, and at no time did she pose a threat to the soldiers.
The story of Iman is perhaps just one tale in the continuing saga of the larger Palestinian tragedy. A schoolgirl, in the first bloom of her teenage years, just walking that morning, for some reason going on to the sand of a piece of land that just months ago had been a fruit orchard, and now converted to a “forbidden zone.”
Who knows why she decided to wander onto that piece of land. Did she not remember that it was a forbidden and dangerous area?
But Iman’s life and death is at least the story of one young girl’s tragedy in the midst of occupation and war, and that of her grieving family.
There are many other stories like this, that bring home the message to the world, that war is full of horror, tragedy and injustice, and that innocent children are too often the victims.
Wednesday, October 06, 2004
Web closes around ‘Anwar’
Sharanjit Singh
MALACCA, Oct 5, 2004
The authorities are looking for "Anwar", author of an offensive remark on Islam Hadhari posted on a local weblog.
Energy, Communications and Multimedia Minister Datuk Seri Dr Lim Keng Yaik said the Communication and Multimedia Commission was working closely with the Malaysian Institute of Microelectronic systems (Mimos) to identify the person and bring him to book.
He said if the person was found to have written something seditious, he would be charged accordingly.
"We can find this ‘Anwar’ and we will charge him if he has broken the law," Keng Yaik said.
Finding "Anwar", he said, would be similar to searching for the person responsible for sending threatening SMS messages to local artiste Siti Nurhaliza.
Keng Yaik, who earlier delivered a keynote address at the International Conference on ICT businesses in Malacca 2004, said he had received a report on the issue.
He said Jeff Ooi, who hosted the blog on which the derogatory comments appeared, had immediately barred "Anwar" when he realised the person had abused it.
"If he (Ooi) had kept the person’s comments on the blog, he would have been a partner in crime," said Keng Yaik.
Ooi has come under fire for allowing the derogatory statement to be posted on his blog.
"Anwar", a participant, posted a comment on Ooi’s website stating it was unacceptable to compare Islam Hadhari and money politics to "water and oil" because water and oil are suci (untainted).
Instead, he said, Islam Hadhari and money politics were like "shit and urine".
Umno Youth has demanded an apology from Ooi and the movement has also called on Malaysians to write to Ooi in protest.
Federal Territority mufti Prof Datuk Dr Mohammed Yusoff Hussain has also condemned the offensive statement, saying it was an insult to Islam.
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Wednesday/National/20041006074600/Article/indexb_html
Badaruddin’s crassness to be expected
Malaysiakini Oct 6, 04 4:53pm
I do not understand why some people are shocked and dismayed by what Badruddin Amiruldin said at the recently concluded Umno election. It is not something unusual.
In fact, rubbing non-Malay Barisan Nasional supporters' noses in the mud after an election by some Umno stalwarts is so popular that it is almost a post-election tradition.
I had expected worse with Umno wallowing in the hubris of their recent resounding victory in the general election. What had happened is the mildest nose rubbing in years. No bigwig was involved except for a wannabe.
If you are a supporter of the opposition than Badruddin's antic was to be expected. However, if you are a BN supporter then there is no reason to gripe. You put people like Badruddin where he is. So why do you fret?
We could have elected a decent man. Instead, many chose to support the election machinery that got Badruddin elected as the member parliament for the Jerai constituency. More than 22 percent of the electorate of that constituency are non-Malay. The other candidate was from PAS.
Appealing for a better sense of decency from this man or the organisation he represents will be fruitless. He is evidently useful to them. That is why he has got this far being what he is. He is now Umno's deputy chairman. Not bad for a man whose obvious talent is in making crass, crude remarks.
Will he change his ways because some non-Malay BN supporters have had their sensitivities bruised? Not likely if past performance is any guide.
If published reports are to be believed, these are some of the remarks that have been attributed to him during a parliamentary debate on the Supply Bill 1999 on Oct 23, 1999 when he heckled Karpal Singh with offensive and derogatory remarks.
‘Hai Bai, duduklah.’
‘Take care of your backside.’
‘Ini bai murtad.’
‘Bai, lu main punggungkah?’
‘Bai, jaga belakanglah.’
‘Hai, bai tiga silinder.’
And in a recent parliamentary debate, in response to PAS' Abdul Fatah Harun's observation that increase in cigarette taxes and prices did not decrease the number of smokers, the indomitable Badruddin shot back a quick ripotse: ‘Muslimat (PAS’ women wing) also smoke cheroot’.
So if you detest bigots and sexists then do not support the organisation that tolerates such individuals. Some of us do not and we have no cause to whine.
http://www3.malaysiakini.com/letters/30580
Tuesday, October 05, 2004
KABINET 2004
